Joyce's bill to scrap net zero laws lapsed without a vote
Barnaby Joyce MP's bill would have scrapped the Climate Change Act, the agency helping coal towns change, rules on car pollution and limits on big polluters. It was dropped from the House's to-do list on 30 June 2026.
Official name: Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025
- The bill would have scrapped five laws, including the Climate Change Act 2022 and the new rules on car fuel use.
- It would have ended the Safeguard Mechanism, which limits pollution from big industrial sites.
- It would have taken mentions of net zero and the Paris Agreement, a 2015 world climate deal, out of other laws.
- It was debated five times but never voted on. It was dropped on 30 June 2026.
Who it affects
- Big polluting sites like mines and factories: They would no longer have had to keep their pollution under set limits.
- Car makers and importers: The national rules on how much new cars can pollute would have ended.
- Renewable energy and green hydrogen producers, who make hydrogen fuel using clean power: The national scheme that shows where clean energy comes from would have ended.
- Workers and towns moving away from coal and gas: The Net Zero Economy Authority, set up to help them, would have been shut down.
Australia's 2050 net zero target
Net zero means a country takes as much greenhouse gas out of the air as it puts in. Greenhouse gases warm the planet. Australia has a goal in law to reach net zero by 2050.
Barnaby Joyce, a member of the House of Representatives, brought this bill there on 28 July 2025. That is the lower house of Parliament. It was a private bill. That means it did not come from the government.
His notes on the bill say net zero has done "massive damage" to the economy. They say it has raised the cost of living. They say most of the world is not following net zero. So, the notes say, Australia's efforts will not change the climate.
The notes say the policy pushes up power prices and closes factories. They say it uses farmland for solar and wind projects. They also say taxpayers back renewable energy firms through secret deals.
Mr Joyce wrote that the bill was "the start of the process, not the conclusion". He said it would not remove every link to net zero in other laws.
Five laws it would scrap
Part 1 of the bill would have cancelled five whole laws.
The Climate Change Act 2022 puts Australia's goals for cutting pollution into law. That includes net zero by 2050.
The Future Made in Australia (Guarantee of Origin) Act 2024 set up a certificate system. A second law sets the charges for it. The certificates track where things like hydrogen and clean power come from. They also show how much pollution was made to produce them.
The Net Zero Economy Authority Act 2024 set up an agency. It helps workers, towns and industries move to a low-pollution economy.
The New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Act 2024 limits the average pollution of new cars each car maker sells. Say a company sells a lot of big petrol utes. Under that law it must balance them with cleaner cars. The bill would have ended that rule.
Net zero cut elsewhere
Part 2 changed three more laws.
The Export Finance and Insurance Corporation is a government lender. It helps Australian firms that sell overseas. Its law gives it a net zero job. It backs projects that help the move to net zero. The bill would have removed that job. It would also have removed any mention of the Paris Agreement and the pollution goals.
The Paris Agreement is a 2015 world deal. Countries agreed to cut pollution to limit global warming.
The Future Made in Australia Act 2024 guides which industries the government backs. It has two streams. One is for the move to net zero. The other is for a strong and secure economy. The bill would have kept only the second stream.
Ending the Safeguard Mechanism
The Safeguard Mechanism sits in the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007. It sets a pollution limit, called a baseline, for Australia's biggest industrial sites. Sites that go over must make up for it. Sites that stay under can earn credits. A credit is a unit that shows a site cut more than it had to.
Items 27 to 51 of the bill would have removed all of these rules. That includes checks on the sites, the credits, and the fines for going over.
Big sites would still have had to report their pollution under the rest of that law.
Dropped after time ran out
The bill was brought in on 28 July 2025. The debate on its main idea began that day. It was debated in the House on 25 August, 1 September, 27 October, 3 November and 24 November 2025.
It never came to a vote. On 30 June 2026 it was dropped from Parliament's to-do list under the House rules. That happens when a private bill sits for a long time with no action.
If it had passed, it would have started the day after it became law. It will not become law in this form.
Its journey through Parliament
| 28 Jul 2025 | House of Representatives: Introduced and read a first time |
| 28 Jul 2025 | House of Representatives: Second reading moved |
| 25 Aug 2025 | House of Representatives: Second reading debate |
| 01 Sep 2025 | House of Representatives: Second reading debate |
| 27 Oct 2025 | House of Representatives: Second reading debate |
| 03 Nov 2025 | House of Representatives: Second reading debate |
| 24 Nov 2025 | House of Representatives: Second reading debate |
| 30 Jun 2026 | House of Representatives: Removed from the Notice Paper in accordance with (SO 42) |