Did not passFamily & Community Introduced in the Senate, 26 Nov 2025 by ANTIC, Sen Alex

Senate rejected Antic's bid to pay vaccine objectors

Senator Alex Antic wanted parents who object to vaccines to get family payments again. One is the Child Care Subsidy, which helps families pay for child care. The Senate voted his bill down on 16 September 2026.

Official name: A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Amendment (No Jab No Pay Repeal) Bill 2025

The short version

Who it affects

No Jab No Pay rules

Some family payments from the government come with a vaccine rule. To get them, a child has to be up to date with their vaccines. The bill's summary names the Child Care Subsidy. That is the payment that helps families pay for child care.

These rules sit in a 1999 law about family payments. In 2015 Parliament passed a law known as No Jab, No Pay. It took away the let-off for parents who object to vaccines because of their beliefs. It also stretched the vaccine rules to cover older children.

This bill tried to undo those 2015 changes. Its notes explain the bill. They say the aim was to "restore freedom of choice for concerned parents". They say the current rules hit families on lower incomes the hardest.

Who brought the bill

This was a private bill. That means the government did not bring it. Senator Alex Antic brought it into the Senate on 26 November 2025. The source papers do not say which party he is in.

What counts as objecting

The bill would have added a new meaning of "conscientious objection" to the law. A parent would have one if they held a belief that their child should not get the usual vaccines. The belief could be personal, religious, medical or based on their view of life.

The usual vaccines are on an official list. It says which vaccines children are meant to get, and at what ages.

How parents could qualify

A child would have met the vaccine rules if two things happened. First, a health worker allowed to give vaccines would talk with the parent. This could be a family doctor or a nurse. They would talk about the gains and risks of vaccines. The health worker would then sign a form saying that talk took place.

Second, the parent would have to sign a statement saying they object.

The same would apply when a child is cared for by more than one adult. If the other carer had the talk and signed the objection, the child would meet the rules for both.

Say a mother does not want her toddler vaccinated because of her beliefs. Under this bill she would see a doctor, hear about the risks and gains, and sign the forms. She could then keep getting the Child Care Subsidy.

Children aged 7 and over

The bill would also have said that any child aged 7 or older meets the vaccine rules. That would be true whether or not the child had any vaccines.

This would have undone the 2015 change that stretched the rules to older children.

Cost and start date

The notes on the bill do not give a cost.

The bill would have started the day after it became law. A bill becomes law when the Governor-General signs it. The Governor-General is the King's representative in Australia.

Voted down in the Senate

Senator Antic brought in the bill on 26 November 2025. He started the debate on its main idea that day.

The Senate debated the bill on 16 September 2026. The same day it voted no on the main idea of the bill. That means the bill was defeated and will not become law.

How they voted

VoteResult
Vote on the main idea
Senate, 16 September 2026
Labor 18 no, Greens 10 no, One Nation 4 aye, Liberal 1 aye, 3 no, United Australia 1 aye, Australia's Voice 1 no, Independent 1 no, Lambie Network 1 no
Noes won 34 to 6

Its journey through Parliament

26 Nov 2025Senate: Introduced and read a first time
26 Nov 2025Senate: Second reading moved
16 Sep 2026Senate: Second reading debate
16 Sep 2026Senate: Second reading negatived

Official sources

Open the full interactive page